Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Accuracy and reliability of distal femoral rotation measurements using the transepicondylar axis in total knee arthroplasty: A cadaver study

  • Seyyed Morteza Kazemi ,
  • Reza Minaei ,
  • Mohammad Nabi Bahrami ,

Abstract

Introduction: The correct alignment of femoral components is necessary to achieve a successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and preventing complications such as pain, stiffness, loosening, instability; which itself, depends on making perfect cuts. The posterior distal femoral cut, is one of the most important factors. Yet, the best method of its measurement is controversial.

Methods: In this study, 20 cadavers of femoral bones were used; on which, the distal femoral rotation (DFR) was measured manually by 8 orthopedic surgeons and also was calculated on the basis of the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) by 2 orthopedic surgeons and 2 radiologists on CT scan image. Accuracy and reliability were assessed in both groups, and the risk of severe malrotation was determined according to an outlier defined as 3 and 5 degrees.

Results: The mean DFR measured manually, was 1.8±2.1º and the one attained by CT scan images was reported 3.3±1.1º, projecting a remarkable difference between two groups. The Kappa reliability index was calculated about 0.81 in CT scan results and 0.64 in the other group. (k>0.7 was considered as valuable). With an outlier defined as 3º, from the normal distal femoral rotation based on posterior condylar axis (PCA), 3º external rotation; 12% of data were outlying in the manually of measured data, and there was no outlier data were reported in the other group. (With a statistically significant difference between two groups)

Conclusion: According to the unreliability and noticeable risk of error in measuring DFR manually based on TEA, this study suggests using CT scan in the patient’s pre-op assessment to obtain the most accurate data.

References

  1. Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 360 (17): 1749-1758.
  2. Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: A literature review. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2009; 95: 365-372.
  3. Berhouet j, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P, Frasca D, Pujol N. Rotational positioning of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty: A CT evaluation. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2011; 97: 699-704.
  4. Viel T, Casin C, Ducellier F, Steiger V, Bigorre N, Bizot P. Is radiographic measurement of distal femoral torsion reliable?. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2013; 99: 517-522.
  5. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determin-ing femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty:reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 301-305.
  6. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS.The effect of femoral component position on patellar trackingafter total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 260: 43-51.
  7. Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2000; 380: 72-79.
  8. Hamilton TW, Strickland LH, Pandit HG. A Meta-Analysis on the Use of Gabapentinoids for the Treatment of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery 2016; 98 (16): 1340-1350.
  9. Dreyer HC, Strycker LA, Senesac HA, Hocker AD, Smolkowski K, Shah SN, Jewett BA. Essential amino acid supplementation in patients following total knee arthroplasty". J Clin Invest. 123 (11): 4654–4666.
  10. Valtonen Anu, Pöyhönen Tapani, Heinonen Ari, Sipilä Sarianna. Muscle Deficits Persist After Unilateral Knee Replacement and Have Implications for Rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 2009; 89 (10): 1072–1079.
  11. Carter Evelene M, Potts Henry WW. Predicting length of stay from an electronic patient record system: a primary total knee replacement example. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2014; 14 (1): 26.
  12. Kerkhoffs GM, Servien E, Dunn W, Dahm D, Bramer JA, Haverkamp D. The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review. The Journal of bone and joint surgery 2012; 94 (20): 1839–1844.
  13. Samson AJ, Mercer GE, Campbell DG. Total knee replacement in the morbidly obese: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80 (9): 595–599.
  14. Leone JM, Hanssen AD. Management of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2006; 55: 449-461.
  15. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y. Computed tomogra-phy measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylaraxis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty2001; 16: 493-497.
  16. Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T, Asano T, Nakamura T.Relationship between frontal knee alignment and referenceaxes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 388: 147-156.
  17. Cho Y, Lee MC. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology 2014; 1: 113e118.
  18. Berhouet J, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P, Frasca D, Pujol N. Rotational positioning of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty: a CT evaluation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97: 699e704.
  19. Incavo SJ, Ronchetti PJ, Howe JG, Tranowski JP. Tibial plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 81e85.
  20. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Walker SA, Tucker A. A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 180e189.
  21. Jabalameli M, Rahbar M, Bagherifard A, Hadi HA, Moradi A, Radi M, Mokhtari T. Evaluation of distal femoral rotational alignment according to transepicondylar axis and Whiteside’s line: a study in Iranian population. Shafa Orthopedic Journal 2014; 1(3): 22-28.
  22. Arima J, Whiteside LA ,McCarthy DS , White S. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. J Bone joint Surg. 1995; 77: 1331-1334.
  23. Loures FB, Neto SF, Pinto RL, Kinder A, Labronici PJ, Góes RFA, Marchiori E. Rotational assessment of distal femur and its relevance in total knee arthroplasty: analysis by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Bras. 2015; 48(5): 282-286.
  24. Won YY, Cui WQ, Baek MH, et al. An additional reference axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1049-1053.
  25. Yip DK, Zhu YH, Chiu KY, et al. Distal rotational alignment of the Chinese femur and its relevance in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 613-619.
  26. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321:168-172.
  27. Mateziolis G, Perka C. Rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: a refresher. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 1:31-35.
  28. Fujii T, Kondo M, Tomari K, Kadoya Y, Tanaka Y. Posterior condylar cartilage may distort rotational alignment of the femoral component based on posterior condylar axis in total knee arthroplasty. Surgical and Radiologic anatomy. 2012; 34(7): 633-638.
  29. Patel AR, Talati RK, Yaffe MA, McCoy BW, Stulberg SD. Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An MRI-Based Evaluation of our Options. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(8): 1666-1670.
  30. Vaidya SV, Gadhiya RM, Bagaria V, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Computed tomographic evaluation of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Indian journal of orthopaedics. 2013; 47(1): 40.
  31. Franceschini V, Nodzo SR, Della Valle AG. Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between Transepicondylar Axis and Posterior Condylar Line Referencing. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(12): 2917-21.

How to Cite

Kazemi, S. M., Minaei, R., & Bahrami, M. N. (2017). Accuracy and reliability of distal femoral rotation measurements using the transepicondylar axis in total knee arthroplasty: A cadaver study. Bali Medical Journal, 6(3), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i3.683

HTML
5

Total
1

Share

Search Panel

Seyyed Morteza Kazemi
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Reza Minaei
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Mohammad Nabi Bahrami
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal