Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Role of selvester scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome



Abstract

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cardiovascular problem because it increases mortality and morbidity. ACS is the acute manifestation of coronary arteries atheromatous plaque torn or ruptured. ECG had been developed to enhance the clinical benefits. Selvester score is one of the assessment method in the ECG that aims to detect and determine the location of damage due to myocardial infarction, judging from the complex of QRS. In some studies it has been reported that Selvester score correlated with the extent of damage after myocardial infarction. By using a specific scoring criteria, with the total number of points earned, Selvester scores are considered a non-invasive tool to assess myocardial damage that is easy to use and provides precise results by using ECG especially in areas with limited diagnostic tools.

Keywords: role acute coronary

References

  1. Irmalita, dkk, editor, 2015. Pedoman Tatalaksana Sindrom Koroner Akut. Ed ke-3. Indonesia:PERKI.
  2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131(4):e29-322.
  3. WHO, 2014. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2014. WHO. 92.
  4. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Murphy A. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:72-115.
  5. Torry Srv., Panda A. L., Ongkowijaya J.. Gambaran Faktor Risiko Penderita Sindrom Koroner Akut. E-clinic 2014;2: 1-8.
  6. Antman EM, Braundwald E. Acute Myocardial Infarction. In: Braundwald E (ed). Heart Disease A Text Book of Cardiovascular Medicine 5th ed, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia; 1997:1184-288.
  7. Selvester R., Wagner G., Hindman N., et al. Electrocardiographic for clinician the Selvester QRS score system for estimating the size of myocardial infarction: The development and application of system. Arch. Intern. Med., 1995;145:1877-81.
  8. Strauss D.G, Selvester R, The QRS complex—a biomarker that “images†the heart: QRS scores to quantify myocardial scar in the presence of normal and abnormal ventricular conduction. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2009;42:85-96.
  9. Mostafa S.A., Alian M.A., Mansour H.A., et al. Electrocardiographic Predictor of Final Infarct Size by Selvester QRS Score in Correlation to Rest Tc99M Sestamibi SPECT after Primary PCI. Med. J. Cairo Univ. 2015;83(1):499-506.
  10. Jahuddin N.H.R., Suaib A.H. 2015, Fokus Utama Pembaharuan Pedoman American Heart Association 2015 untuk CPR and ECC. American Heart Association.
  11. Foley T.A., Mankad S.V., Anavekar N.S., et al. Measuring Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction techniquesand potential pitfalls. European Cardiology Journals. 2012;8(2):108-14.
  12. Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2004-13.
  13. Badimon L, Padro T, Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2012;1:60–74.
  14. Davi G, Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2482-94.
  15. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J.P., et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation – Web Addenda. European Heart Journal. 2016:2-14.
  16. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J.P., et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2016;37:267-315.
  17. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:2525–2538
  18. Steg G., James S.K., Atar D., ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2012;33:2569-619.
  19. Al Ghatrif M, Lindsay J. A brief review: history to understand fundamentals of electrocardiography. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2012;2:143-83.
  20. Titomir LI. The remote past and near future of electrocardiology: view-Pointt of a biomedical engineer. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2000;101(5):272-9.
  21. Pardee HEB. An electrocardiographic sign of coronary artery obstruction. Arch Int Med. 1920;26:244-57.
  22. Wolferth CC, Wood FC. The electrocardiographic diagnosis of coronary occlusion by the use of chest leads. Am J Med Sci.1932;183:30-35.
  23. Clemmensen P, Sejersten M, Sillesen M, dkk. Diversion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients for primary angioplasty based on wireless prehospital 12-lead electrocardiographic transmission directly to the cardiologist's handheld computer: a progress report. J Electrocardiol. 2005;38(4):194-8.
  24. Cooper J. "Electrocardiography 100 years ago. Origins, pioneers, and contributors". N Engl J Med. 1986;315(7):461–4.
  25. Zainul Abedin and Roberth Corner .2008. ECG Interpretation The Self-Assesment Approach second edititon .Blackwell Publishing: USA.
  26. Rampengan S.H, 2016. Hubungan Helicobacter Pylori dengan Fraksi Ejeksi Ventrikel Kiri pada Pasien Infark Miokard Akut. Unsrat.
  27. Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL and Arzbaecher RC. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation. 1970;41:899-912.
  28. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329-38.
  29. Anderson WD, Wagner NB, Lee KL, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .6. Identification of screening criteria for non-acute myocardial infarcts. American Journal of Cardiology. 1988;61:729-33.
  30. Freye CJ, Wagner NB, Howe CM,et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .8. Specificity in a control-group with left-ventricular hypertrophy and proposal of a new scoring system for use with this confounding factor. Journal of Electrocardiology. 1992;25:19-23.
  31. Hindman NB, Schocken DD, Widmann M, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .5. Specificity and method of application of the complete system. American Journal of Cardiology. 1985;55:1485-1490.
  32. Howe CM, Freye CJ, Wagner NB, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .7. Specificity in a control-group with right ventricular hypertrophy due to mitral-stenosis. American Journal of Cardiology. 1988;62:322-324.
  33. Ideker RE, Wagner GS, Ruth WK, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .2. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. American Journal of Cardiology. 1982;49:1604-1614.
  34. Roark SF, Ideker RE, Wagner GS, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .3. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts. American Journal of Cardiology. 1983;51:382-389.
  35. Wagner GS, Freye CJ, Palmeri ST, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .1. Specificity and observer agreement. Circulation. 1982;65:342-347.
  36. Ward RM, White RD, Ideker RE, et al. Evaluation of a qrs scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size .4. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for posterolateral infarcts. American Journal of Cardiology. 1984;53:706-714.
  37. Engblom H, Wagner GS, Setser RM, et al. Quantitative clinical assessment of chronic anterior myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and QRS scoring. Am Heart J. 2003;146:359-66.
  38. Xiong Y, Wang L, Liu W, Hankey GJ, Xu B and Wang S. The Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:604-13.
  39. Wagner GS, et al. evaluation of a QRS Scoring System for Estimating Myocardial Infarct Size. Circulation. 1982. 65:2;342-7.
  40. Palmeri ST, et al. A QRS scoring system for assesing left ventricular function after myocardial infarct. The New Eng. Journal. 1982;306:1; 4-9.
  41. Prashant G, Sharma R. Accurancy of ECG in assessment of post myocardial infarction left ventricular function & its comparison with echocardiography. IOSR-JDMS. 2014. 13:10; 80-4.
  42. Selvester R.H., Wagner S., Hindman. The Selvester QRS Scoring System for Estimating Myocardial Infarct Size. Arch Intern Med, 1985; 145:1877-81.
  43. Wilson FN, Kossmann CE, Burch GE, et al. Recommendations for standardization of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic leads. Circulation. 1954;10(4):564-73.
  44. Fye B, MD. A History of Origin, Evolution, and Impact of Electrocardiography. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1994;73(13):937-49.
  45. M. Bergovec, H. Prpic, Mihatov, M. Zigman, et al. The value of the QRS scoring system in assessing regional and global left ventricular ejection fraction early after myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal. 1993;14:1102-9.
  46. Huseyin Uyarel, MD, Nese Cam, MD, Ertan Okmen, MD,et al. Level of Selvester QRS score is predictive of ST-segment resolution and 30-day outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2006;151:1239.e121239.e7.
  47. Walther C.M.R, MD, Marit C. van Boreen, MD, Madeleine Robinson, MD, et al. Comparison of the correlation of the Selvester QRS scoring system with cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–measured acute myocardial infarct size in patients with and without thrombolytic therapy. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2009;42:139–44.
  48. Shaimaa M.A.,M.D., Mohamed A.A.,M.D., Heba A. M.,M.D., et al. Electrocardiographic Predictor of Final Infarct Size by Selvester QRS Score in Correlation to Rest Tc99M Sestamibi SPECT after Primary PCI. Med. J. Cairo Univ.2015;83(1):499-506.

How to Cite

Rampengan, S. H., Adriana, I., & Panda, A. L. (2017). Role of selvester scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Bali Medical Journal, 6(1), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i1.484
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
6

Total
21

Share

Search Panel

Starry H Rampengan
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Ike Adriana
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Agnes Lucia Panda
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal