Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The effect of free peritoneal patch on bursting pressure in primary gastric suturing with peritonitis conditions (study on New Zealand White rabbits)

  • Ferry Rusdiansaputra ,
  • Edwin Danardono ,
  • I Gusti Bagus Adria Hariastawa ,


Abstract

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/L5cB4oIP45U

 

Background: perforated peptic ulcer is still a challenge for surgeons and requires a strategy to provide a good outcome. Currently, research on protective biomaterials still has limitations. Free peritoneal patch has growth factors, is antimicrobial, and increases angiogenesis and progenitor properties, which is useful for wound healing. This study examines the healing of primary gastric suturing with peritoneal patches in peritonitis conditions by measuring bursting pressure.

Methods: Researchers conducted an experimental study using 30 New Zealand White Rabbits induced by fecal peritonitis. An artificial perforation with a diameter of 1 cm in the gastric corpus was performed, and primary suturing was performed using 5/0 silk thread with 2 simple sutures. In the treatment group, a free peritoneal patch was added. The bursting pressure examination was carried out on the 7th postoperative day.

Results: Changes in the body weight of the rabbits before and after surgery reflecting the nutritional status of the sample did not significantly affect the value of bursting pressure (p>0.05). Meanwhile, the value of bursting pressure in the primary gastric suturing group with a free peritoneal patch was significantly higher than in the primary gastric suturing group without adding a free peritoneal patch (p<0.05).

Conclusion: A free peritoneal patch can be used as a biological dressing to prevent leakage in gastric primary suturing in conditions of peritonitis, as shown by higher bursting pressure values.

Keywords: bursting pressure free peritoneal patch peritonitis primary gastric suturing

References

  1. Weledji EP. An overview of gastroduodenal perforation. Frontiers in Surgery. 2020;7(1):573901.
  2. Uludag M, Citgez B, Ozkaya O, Yetkin G, Ozcan O, Polat N, et al. Effects of amniotic membrane on the healing of normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses in rats. International journal of colorectal disease. 2009;24(1):809-817.
  3. Yin WY. Free peritoneal graft for repair of a severe seromuscular defect of bowel: From experiment to clinical practice. Journal of Surgical Research. 2005;125(1): 3-8.
  4. Wang YL, Chan XW, Chan KS, Shelat VG. Omental patch repair of large perforated peptic ulcers≥ 25 mm is associated with higher leak rate. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research. 2021;7(6):759-766.
  5. Bellón JM, Rodríguez M, Pérez-Köhler B, Pérez-López P, Pascual G. The New Zealand white rabbit as a model for preclinical studies addressing tissue repair at the level of the abdominal wall. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2017;23(12):863-880.
  6. Blackburn SC, Stanton MP. Anatomy and physiology of the peritoneum. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2014; 23(6):326–330.
  7. Chen C. The art of bowel anastomosis. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2012;101(4):238-240.
  8. Esteves PJ, Abrantes J, Baldauf HM, BenMohamed L, Chen Y, Christensen N, et al. The wide utility of rabbits as models of human diseases. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2018;50(5):1-10.
  9. Almutairi AS. A descriptive analysis of patient’s preferences in bone graft therapy in dentistry. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2019;13(3):24.
  10. Nordentoft T, Rømer J, Sørensen M. Sealing of gastrointestinal anastomoses with a fibrin glue-coated collagen patch: a safety study. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2007;20(6):363-369.
  11. Pearce SC, Coia HG, Karl JP, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Zachos NC, Racicot K. Intestinal in vitro and ex vivo models to study host-microbiome interactions and acute stressors. Frontiers in physiology. 2018;9:1584.
  12. Khoorjestan SM, Rouhi G, Toolabi K. Experimental investigations on intestinal anastomosis—a comparison between automatic and hand suturing techniques. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology. 2016;16(04): 1650056.
  13. Cina D, Patel P, Bethune JC, Thoma J, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Hoff CM, et al. Peritoneal morphological and functional changes associated with platelet-derived growth factor B. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2009;24(2):448-457.
  14. Foroutan T, Hosseini A, Pourfatholah AA, Soleimani M, Alimoghadam K, Mosaffa N. Peritoneal mesothelial progenitor or stem cell. J Biol Sci. 2010;10(5):460-464.
  15. Deitch EA. Rodent models of intra-abdominal infection. Shock. 2005;24(1):19-23.
  16. Thomas MS, Margolin DA. Management of colorectal anastomotic leak. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2016;29(02):138-144.
  17. Lee SY, Jung MR, Kim CH, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Nutritional risk screening score is an independent predictive factor of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2018;72(4):489-495.
  18. Ridiandries A, Tan JT, Bursill CA. The role of chemokines in wound healing. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(10):3217.
  19. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiological reviews. 2019;99(1):665-706.
  20. Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Critical care medicine. 2003;31(8):S538-S546.
  21. Dharma BDA, Mulyantari NK, Prabawa IPY. Analisis korelasi kadar serum prokalsitonin dengan jumlah leukosit pada penderita dengan kecurigaan sepsis di RSUP Sanglah, Bali, Indonesia. Intisari Sains Medis. 2020;11(1):179-182.
  22. Sinaga MM, Budipramana VS, Nugraha J. The correlation of blood thiamine concentrations with lactate acidosis in peritonitis patients with sepsis. Bali Medical Journal. 2021;10(1):214–218.
  23. Nugrahadi AJ, Matulatan F, Hariastawa IGBA. The effect of free peritoneal patch on fibroblast count and density of collagen on primary colon anastomosis in intraperitoneal infection in New Zealand White Rabbit model. Bali Medical Journal. 2022;11(3):2066–2070.
  24. Nugraha GL, Septarendra D, Lesmana T. Comparative study of SOFA, WSESSSS, and CPIRO scoring systems as mortality predictors in a patient with complicated intra-abdominal infection. Bali Medical Journal. 2022;11(3):1397–1403.

How to Cite

Rusdiansaputra, F., Danardono, E., & Hariastawa, I. G. B. A. (2023). The effect of free peritoneal patch on bursting pressure in primary gastric suturing with peritonitis conditions (study on New Zealand White rabbits). Bali Medical Journal, 12(3), 3037–3041. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i3.4741
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Ferry Rusdiansaputra
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Edwin Danardono
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

I Gusti Bagus Adria Hariastawa
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal