Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Clinical research capacity evaluation at Prof. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar: Teaching general hospital, Indonesia

Abstract

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/0zW7g_T0heE

 

Introduction: Applying research activity in hospitals in Indonesia is a kind of challenge. This study aimed to assess the research’s capacity in Prof. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital. It is related to the indicators and cultural analysis at the team, organization, and individual levels in Prof. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional study and qualitative analysis using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were conducted in July-August 2022 at Prof. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital. The Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) validated survey measured self-reported research capacity at leadership, individual, team, and organization levels. Additionally, this study explored barriers and motivators. The rate of research capacity decisions and the domains in this study use the ROC curve. This statistical analysis used chi-square with a significance of p-value < 0.05.

Results: One hundred and thirty respondents were analyzed. The individual characteristics were 45-54 years old, male, medical specialist, clinician without structural position, with a master’s degree or specialist, internal medicine department and pediatric department, 0–10 years of work history, 1–10 journal publications, and having a research history. In leadership and team capacity, most have low scores, and in individual capacity, organization and research capacity have high scores. There is a statistically strong relationship between each domain and research capacity.

Conclusions: High research capacity in a hospital is very important. Evidence-based research can be used to support the services and progress of the hospital itself, especially as a teaching hospital.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Hospitals. 2022;
  2. Kementerian Kesehatan. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. 2023.
  3. Burke LG, Frakt AB, Khullar D, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between teaching status and mortality in US hospitals. JAMA. 2017;317(20):2105–13.
  4. KAOW-ARSOM. Symposium on the Evaluation of Development Research. 2009.
  5. Jahani MA, Rahimi V, Mahmoudjanloo S, Mahmoudi G, Bahrami MA. The relationship between learning levels and job satisfaction among hospital employees with the job class as a moderator variable. Bali Med J. 2017;6(1):173.
  6. Harding KE, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41 1:45–53.
  7. Cooke J. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:44.
  8. Marjanovic S, Lichten CA, Robin E, Parks S, Harte EC, MacLure C, et al. How policy can help develop and sustain workforce capacity in UK dementia research: insights from a career tracking analysis and stakeholder interviews. BMJ Open. 2016;6: e012052.
  9. Probst H, Harris R, McNair HA, Baker A, Miles E, Beardmore C. Research from therapeutic radiographers: An audit of research capacity within the UK. Radiography. 2015;21:112–8.
  10. Mccance T, Fitzsimons D, Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. Capacity building in nursing and midwifery research and development: an old priority with a new perspective. J Adv Nurs. 2007;59 1:57–67.
  11. Joffres C, Heath S, Farquharson J, Barkhouse K, Latter C, Maclean DR. Facilitators and challenges to organizational capacity building in heart health promotion. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:39–60.
  12. Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the minister of health of the republic of indonesia number 62 of 2017. 2017.
  13. Mickan S, Coates D. Embedded researchers in Australia: Survey of profile and experience across medical, nursing and midwifery and allied health disciplines. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(3–4):417–26.
  14. Henshall C, Greenfield DM, Jarman H, Rostron H, Jones H, Barrett S. A nationwide initiative to increase nursing and midwifery research leadership: overview of year one programme development, implementation and evaluation. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(15–16):5369-81.
  15. Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce RA, et al. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evidence and Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68.
  16. Slade SC, Philip K, Morris ME. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review. Heal Res policy Syst. 2018;16(1):29.
  17. Albert E, Mickan S. Closing the gap and widening the scope. New directions for research capacity building in primary health care. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32(12):1038-40,1043.
  18. Clifford C, Murray S. Pre- and post-test evaluation of a project to facilitate research development in practice in a hospital setting. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36 5:685–95.
  19. Brandenburg C, Noble C, Wenke RJ, Hughes I, Barrett A, Wellwood J, et al. Relationship between research culture and research activity of medical doctors: A survey and audit. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2137–50.
  20. Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53–9.

How to Cite

Agustini, T. F., Sjaaf, A. C., Sulistiadi, W., & Hendrawan, H. (2023). Clinical research capacity evaluation at Prof. I.G.N.G Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar: Teaching general hospital, Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal, 12(3), 2630–2637. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i3.4720

HTML
9

Total
5

Share

Search Panel

Tri Fajari Agustini
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Amal Chalik Sjaaf
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Wachyu Sulistiadi
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Harimat Hendrawan
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal