Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Endometrial thickness is a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma

  • Very Great Eka Putra ,
  • Teuku Mirza Iskandar ,


Background: Ultrasonography is a method that is commonly used today to measure endometrial thickness. It is useful as the initial step to detect endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. This study seeks to explore the predictive role of endometrial thickness in the development of endometrial cancer and identify the variables that affect endometrial thickness.

Methods: This study is a cross sectional retrospective analytical study of women with a history of endometrial cancer who underwent transabdominal ultrasonography or transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) followed by complete surgical staging between January 2019 and December 2021 at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang. Patients were categorized by endometrial thickness into ≤8 mm and >8 mm. In order to compare the endometrial thickness and clinicopathology traits, a bivariate analysis was done. The study proceeded with multivariate analysis and logistic regression if more than one bivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation (p<0.25).

Results: This study involved 55 participants who had endometrial thickness measurements taken. Endometrial thickness was used to divide the patient population into two groups: ≤8 mm (n=28) and >8 mm (n=27). Tumor differentiation grading showed a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.001). The thickness of the endometrium is a significant prognostic of endometrial carcinoma based on the degree of tumor differentiation (p<0.001). With each millimeter increase in the endometrium, the likelihood of endometrial carcinoma increases significantly by 1,25 [p<0.001; 95%CI =1.112-1.404] times.

Conclusion: As a result, the degree of tumor differentiation on post-operative histological analysis is correlated with the thickness of the endometrium. The endometrium's thickness considerably increased as the tumor differentiation level deteriorated. These findings highlight the significance of endometrial thickness as a possible predictor of tumor differentiation and prognosis in endometrial cancer.


  1. Sofyan N, Sudiana IK, Askandar B. Profile of Endometrial Cancer Patients in the Third Referral Hospital in Surabaya based on Known Risk Factors. Biomolecular and Health Science Journal. 2020;3(2):66. Available from:
  2. Zhang S, Gong T-T, Liu F-H, Jiang Y-T, Sun H, Ma X-X, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Endometrial Cancer, 1990-2017: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2017. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1440. Available from:
  3. Ariyanto TB. Perbandingan Luaran Pasien Kanker Endometrium Yang Dilakukan Operasi Laparoskopi Dan Yang Dilakukan Operasi Laparotomi di RSUD Dr. Soetomo Tahun 2017. Medical and Health Science Journal. 2020;4(1):55–62. Available from:
  4. Kurniawati D, Tjokroprawiro BA, Perbowo P. Cervical invasion and lymphovascular space invasion as the most associated risk factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Bali Medical Journal. 2022;11(2):797–802.
  5. Iskandar TM, Putra VGE, Ambari E, Cahyono E, Lubena. Clinicopathological characteristics and possible risk factors for extrauterine metastases in endometrial carcinoma. Bali Medical Journal. 2022;11(3):1410–4.
  6. Talhouk A, McAlpine JN. New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract. 2016;3:14. Available from:
  7. Iskandar TM, Putra VGE, Ambari E, Cahyono E, Lubena. Factors associated with lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Bali Medical Journal. 2022;11(2):784–8.
  8. Rodriguez AM, Polychronopoulou E, Hsu E, Shah R, Lamiman K, Kuo Y-F. Factors associated with endometrial cancer and hyperplasia among middle-aged and older Hispanics. Gynecol Oncol. 2020/11/19. 2021;160(1):16–23. Available from:
  9. Chelmow D, Brooks R, Cavens A, Huber-Keener K, Scott DM, Sheth SS, et al. Executive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2022/03/10. 2022;139(4):626–43. Available from:
  10. Persadie RJ. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Endometrial Thickness: A Review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2002;24(2):131–6. Available from:
  11. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 734: The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Endometrium of Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;131(5):e124–9. Available from:
  12. Timmermans A, Opmeer BC, Khan KS, Bachmann LM, Epstein E, Clark TJ, et al. Endometrial Thickness Measurement for Detecting Endometrial Cancer in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;116(1):160–7. Available from:
  13. Park YR, Lee SW, Kim Y, Bae IY, Kim H-K, Choe J, et al. Endometrial thickness cut-off value by transvaginal ultrasonography for screening of endometrial pathology in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019/10/07. 2019;62(6):445–53. Available from:
  14. Nakamura H, Tsuda H, Hosoi M, Sato T, Inoue T, Nishimura S, et al. Endometrial thickness in Japanese women with hypertension or/and type 2 diabetes mellitus. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2006;129(2):174–7.
  15. Chen L, Berek JS. Endometrial carcinoma: Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention [Internet]. UpToDate. 2023. Available from:
  16. Hebbar S, Chaya V, Rai L, Ramachandran A. Factors influencing endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(4):608–14. Available from:
  17. McCormick BA, Wilburn RD, Thomas MA, Williams DB, Maxwell R, Aubuchon M. Endometrial thickness predicts endometrial hyperplasia in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2625–7. Available from:
  18. Huvila J, McAlpine JN. Endometrial cancer: Pathology and classification [Internet]. UpToDate. 2022. Available from:
  19. Epstein E, Fischerova D, Valentin L, Testa AC, Franchi D, Sladkevicius P, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;51(6):818–28. Available from:
  20. Namazov A, Gemer O, Hag-Yahia N, Eitan R, Raban O, Vaknin Z, et al. Increased ultrasonographic endometrial thickness is associated with poor survival in patients with endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2021;47(5):1098–102. Available from:

How to Cite

Putra, V. G. E., & Iskandar, T. M. (2023). Endometrial thickness is a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma. Bali Medical Journal, 12(2), 2083–2087.




Search Panel

Very Great Eka Putra
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Teuku Mirza Iskandar
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal