Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Evaluation of the Implementation of Objective Structural Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the Faculty of Medicine: a Literature Review



Abstract

Medical educators always want the best method for conducting formative and summative student evaluations. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an assessment that evaluates aspects of clinical competence in a comprehensive, consistent and structured manner with due observance of objectivity. Clinical skills assessment in OSCE includes history taking, physical examination, communication skills, professionalism, technical skills, problem-solving, decision-making, and time management. However, OSCE is currently one of the exams that students are afraid of, causing sleep disturbances and anxiety. In addition, OSCE involves many personnel in its implementation, so good coordination is needed to create a conducive exam situation. Therefore, evaluation is very important to measure student competency or capability, determine goals that have been and have not been achieved, and get feedback to improve OSCE implementation in the future.

Keywords: Evaluation Feedback Medical student Objective Structural Clinical Examination (OSCE)

References

  1. Majumder MAA, Kumar A, Krishnamurthy K, Ojeh N, Adams OP, Sa B. An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:387–97.
  2. Suyanto S, Isrovianingrum R. Kecemasan mahasiswa perawat sebelum mengikuti ujian ketrampilan di laboratorium. J Heal Sci. 2018;11(2 SE-Articles):97–103. Available from: https://journal2.unusa.ac.id/index.php/JHS/article/view/101
  3. Gupta P, Dewan P, Singh T. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Revisited. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(11):911–20.
  4. Selvia A, Kusumawati W, Fitriani H. The evaluation of objective structure clinical examination ( OSCE ) implementation within midwifery school. 2019;2(1):40–9.
  5. Zayyan M. Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice. Oman Med J. 2011;26(4):219–22.
  6. Yousef AA, Awary BH, Alqurashi FO, Al-qahtani MH, Husain SI, Sharif O. Innovative Method to Digitize a Web-Based OSCE Evaluation System for Medical Students : A Cross-Sectional Study in University Hospital in Saudi Arabia. 2022;(January):1085–95.
  7. Indarwati F, Primanda Y, Haris F, Sutrisno RY. Content validity and inter-rater reliability of procedural skill checklists used in the online OSCE scoring management system. 2023;12(1):456–61.
  8. Najarkolai AR, Keshmiri F, Motlagh MK, Saljoughi N. Inter-Professional Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination ( ITOSCE ): teaching and assessment strategies of the inter professional approach. 2016;5(3):463–9.
  9. Sari P. HUBUNGAN TINGKAT STRES DALAM MENGHADAPI OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) DENGAN KUALITAS TIDUR PADAMAHASISWA FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SUMATERA UTARA. Sumatera Utara; 2020. p. 1–72.
  10. Putra WYD, Hadiati T, Sarjana W. No Title. J Kedokt Diponegoro (Diponegoro Med Journal); Vol 6, No 2 J Kedokt DIPONEGORODO - 1014710/dmj.v6i218648 . Available from: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/medico/article/view/18648
  11. Omu AE, Al-azemi MK, Omu FE, Al-harmi J, Fidelis M, Diejomaoh E. Attitudes of Academic Staff and Students towards the Objective Structured Clinical Examination ( OSCE ) in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016;(May):886–97.
  12. Magdalena I, Fauzi HN, Putri R. Pentingnya Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Dan Akibat Memanipulasinya. J Pendidik dan Sains. 2020;2(2):244–57. Available from: https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/bintang
  13. Ifeoma EF. The Role of Evaluation in Teaching and Learning Process in Education. Int J Adv Acad Educ Res. 2022;13(5):120–9.
  14. Srinivasan P. Evaluation in Education. Manichander, editor. Laxmi Book Publication, Solapur; 2016.
  15. Febrianto R, Puspitaningsih F. Education Journal : Journal Education Research and Development. :1–18.
  16. Humphrey-Murto S, Mihok M, Pugh D, Touchie C, Halman S, Wood TJ. Feedback in the OSCE: What Do Residents Remember? Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):52–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2015.1107487
  17. Junod Perron N, Louis-Simonet M, Cerutti B, Pfarrwaller E, Sommer J, Nendaz M. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors’ profile. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):293. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x
  18. Ngim CF, Fullerton PD, Ratnasingam V, Arasoo VJT, Dominic NA, Niap CPS, et al. Feedback after OSCE: A comparison of face to face versus an enhanced written feedback. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02585-z
  19. Wardman MJ, Yorke VC, Hallam JL. Evaluation of a multi-methods approach to the collection and dissemination of feedback on OSCE performance in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(2):e203–11.
  20. Harrison CJ, Molyneux AJ, Blackwell S, Wass VJ. How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):323–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.932901
  21. Loh CYR, Teo TC. Understanding Asian students learning styles, cultural influence and learning strategies. J Educ Soc Policy. 2017;7(1):194–210.
  22. Wong JK-K. Are the Learning Styles of Asian International Students Culturally or Contextually Based?. Int Educ J. 2004;4(4):154–66.
  23. Herlambang PM, Yana DR, Riambodo RM, Sudaryanto S. Implementasi Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) berbasis dalam Jaringan selama Pandemi Coronavirus Disease-19. J Kesehat Vokasional. 2021;6(2):90.
  24. Jutant E-M, Sesé L, Patout M, Messika J, Maître B, Gille T, et al. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) for students’ training and assessment in the French respiratory medicine departments in 2021: An overview. Respir Med Res. 2022;81:100883.
  25. Goh HS, Ng E, Tang ML, Zhang H, Liaw SY. Psychometric testing and cost of a five-station OSCE for newly graduated nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;112:105326.
  26. Gröne O, Mielke I, Knorr M, Ehrhardt M, Bergelt C. Associations between communication OSCE performance and admission interviews in medical education. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):2270–5.
  27. Sales I, Bawazeer G, Adam Mahmoud M, Aljohani MA, Almalag HM, Alhossan A, et al. Use of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess intern performance in an advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) Ambulatory Care rotation. Saudi Pharm J SPJ Off Publ Saudi Pharm Soc. 2021;29(12):1399–404.
  28. Kurnia M, Giri W, Lasmawan IW, Putra A. Mapping the Suitability of Clinical Skills Examinations in the Medical Study Program. 2022;11(2):343–52.
  29. Miller AN, Bharathan A, Duvuuri VNS, Navas V, Luceno L, Zraick R, et al. Use of seven types of medical jargon by male and female primary care providers at a university health center. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(5):1261–7.
  30. Ismail MA-A, Mohammad JA-M. Kahoot: A Promising Tool for Formative Assessment in Medical Education. Educ Med J. 2017;9(2):19–26.
  31. Ramadhany NF, Khoiriyah U. Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Peran Pasien Simulasi dalam Ujian OSCE di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Indonesia. :21–30.
  32. Borno HT, Lin TK, Zhang S, Skafel A, Lalanne A, Dornsife D, et al. Accelerating cancer clinical trial recruitment through a financial reimbursement program integrated with patient navigation: an interrupted time series analysis. J cancer policy. 2021;30:100305.
  33. Thoomes-de Graaf M, Wiersma RE, Karel Y, Duijn E, Spek B, Rizopoulos D, et al. The Effect of a Personalized Newsletter to Physical Therapists on Patient Recruitment: A Cluster Randomized Trial in Primary Physiotherapy Care. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(5):476–82.
  34. Ellis R, Cleland J, Scrimgeour DSG, Lee AJ, Brennan PA. A cross-sectional study examining the association between MRCS performance and surgeons receiving sanctions against their medical registration. Surgeon. 2022;20(4):211–5.
  35. Links AR, Callon W, Wasserman C, Walsh J, Beach MC, Boss EF. Surgeon use of medical jargon with parents in the outpatient setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(6):1111–8.
  36. Jindal P, Khurana G. The opinion of post graduate students on objective structured clinical examination in Anaesthesiology: A preliminary report. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(3):168–73.
  37. Al-Mously N, Nabil NM, Salem R. Student Feedback on OSPE: An Experience of a New Medical School in Saudi Arabia. Med Sci Educ. 2012;22(1):10–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341746
  38. Schoonheim-Klein M, Hoogstraten J, Habets L, Aartman I, Van der Vleuten C, Manogue M, et al. Language background and OSCE performance: a study of potential bias. Eur J Dent Educ Off J Assoc Dent Educ Eur. 2007;11(4):222–9.

How to Cite

Manuaba, I. B. A. P., & Yani, M. V. W. (2023). Evaluation of the Implementation of Objective Structural Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the Faculty of Medicine: a Literature Review. Bali Medical Journal, 12(1), 1163–1166. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i1.4383
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
6

Total
1

Share

Search Panel

Ida Bagus Amertha Putra Manuaba
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Made Violin Weda Yani
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal