Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Comparison of agility between the flat foot and normal foot in East Java Puslatda athletes

  • Bobby Kennedy ,
  • Damayanti Tinduh ,
  • Ditaruni Asrina Utami ,
  • I Putu Alit Pawana ,
  • Soenarnatalina Melaniani ,

Abstract

Background: Flat foot, also known as pes planus, is a postural deformity characterized by the fall of the foot's arch, with all or almost all of the soles of the foot in contact with a flat surface. A flat foot is related to the function of the lower leg, increases the likelihood of sports injuries, and affects the motor abilities of the lower limbs. This study aims to compare the agility of the athletes of the East Java Puslatda with flat feet and normal feet.

Method: This study is an observational retrospective study using the medical records of athletes who underwent sports injury risk screening at the Sports Clinic RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya. Subjects were divided into the flat foot and normal foot groups. The agility of both groups was measured using Agility T-drill test tools and compared between the two groups.

Results: There were 46 subjects divided into 23 subjects in the flat foot group (14 males and 9 females aged 17-33 years) and 23 subjects in the normal foot group (12 males and 11 females aged 16-31 years). The average agility in the flat foot group was 11.23 ± 0.19 seconds (9.62 seconds - 12.74 seconds), while in the normal foot group, it was 11.12 ± 0.21 seconds (9.16 seconds - 13.38 seconds). There was no significant difference in agility between the two study groups. Analysis of each sport showed no significant difference in agility between the flat foot and normal foot groups. Analysis according to intrinsic factors showed a significant positive correlation with moderate strength between agility and gender.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in agility between athletes with flat foot and normal foot.

References

  1. Sivachandiran S and Vinod KG. Effect of corrective exercises programme among athletes with flat feet on foot alignment factors. IJPEH. 2016;3(6). p193-196.
  2. Nakhostin-roohi B, Hedayati S, and Aghayari A. The effect of flexible flat-footedness on selected physical fitness factors in female students aged 14 to 17 years. JHSE. 2013;8(3). p788–796. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.83.03.
  3. Tudor A, Ruzic L, Sestan B, Sirola L, Prpic T. Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):e386-e392. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2262.
  4. Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(3):378-382.
  5. Rasheed QH and Pagare SB. Effect of flat foot deformity on selected physical fitness components in school going children. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015;5(6). p1–5.
  6. Hermassi S, Fadhloun M, Chelly MS, and Bensbaa A. Relationship between agility t-test and physical fitness measures as indicators of performance in elite adolescent handball players. PPMVPS. 2011;5(5). p125–131.
  7. Musavi S, Ghasemi B, and Davodi M. The relationship of the rate of internal longitudinal foot arch within cardiorespiratory endurance and agility in male student (12-14 years old). Sport Sciences and Health Research. 2011;3(2). p49-65.
  8. Imam K, Untung M, Nyiring P, and Ramadhan R. The relationship between flat foot and agility of badminton athletes in Metla Raya Badminton Association, Sleman District. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Universitas Respati Yogyakarta. 2021. p332–337.
  9. Bonacci J, Chapman A, Blanch P, Vicenzino B. Neuromuscular adaptations to training, injury and passive interventions: implications for running economy. Sports Med. 2009;39(11):903-921. doi:10.2165/11317850-000000000-00000.
  10. Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195-218. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547.
  11. Kim MK, Lee YS. Kinematic analysis of the lower extremities of subjects with flat feet at different gait speeds. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(5):531-533. doi:10.1589/jpts.25.531.
  12. Petraglia F, Ramazzina I, Costantino C. Plantar fasciitis in athletes: diagnostic and treatment strategies. A systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7(1):107-118. doi:10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.107.
  13. Nagy E, Feher-Kiss A, Barnai M, Domján-Preszner A, Angyan L, Horvath G. Postural control in elderly subjects participating in balance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(1):97-104. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0407-x.
  14. Zemková E and Hamar D. Agility performance in athletes of different sport specializations. Acta Gymnica. 2014; 44(3):133–140. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2014.013.
  15. Bhoir T, Anap DB, Diwate A. Prevalence of flat foot among 18 - 25 years old physiotherapy students: cross sectional study. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2014; 3(4):272–278.
  16. Sukamti ER, Budiarti R, Nugroho W, Miftachurochmah Y, Azeem KA. Study of physical fitness characteristics of junior wushu players depend on sex difference. Jurnal Keolahragaan. 2022;10(1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v10i1.44068.

How to Cite

Kennedy, B., Tinduh, D., Utami, D. A., Pawana, I. P. A., & Melaniani, S. (2023). Comparison of agility between the flat foot and normal foot in East Java Puslatda athletes. Bali Medical Journal, 12(1), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i1.3955

HTML
4

Total
3

Share

Search Panel

Bobby Kennedy
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Damayanti Tinduh
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Ditaruni Asrina Utami
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


I Putu Alit Pawana
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Soenarnatalina Melaniani
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal