Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Benefits and challenges of peer learning methods in health professional students: A literature review

  • Dyah Sriwigati ,
  • Lisa Musharyanti ,


Abstract

Introduction: The curriculum for health profession education uses a variety of teaching techniques. A strategy is needed to create a creative learning environment during the implementation of the academic learning process so that students can achieve the expected competencies. Peer learning is one of the learning methods to facilitate student learning experience. Peer learning (PL) uses peers as tutors in the learning process and the process of students learning with and from each other. The application of the peer learning method in the health student learning curriculum is considered to have several advantages and challenges.

Purpose: To identify the benefits and challenges of implementing peer learning methods on health professional students.

Methodology: This study is a literature review with databases form ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus and Emerald. The articles search results obtained 10 articles that were screened using the PRISMA guide. This study is looking for articles about peer learning methods in health students who are included in the inclusion criteria.

Findings: There are total 1273 articles obtained from 4 databases, with details ScienceDirect 499 articles, PubMed 366 articles, Scopus 255 articles and Emerald 153 articles. The results of a review of 10 articles show that the peer learning method can be implemented in academic learning settings as well as clinical learning. The application of peer learning methods in the learning process has several benefits including; improve social skills, increase knowledge and better understanding of learning materials, increase self-confidence, improve clinical skills. Apart from the benefits, there are some challenges in implementing the PL method.

Implication: PL can be applied in health student learning because it has many benefits for health students.

Keywords: peer learning peer assisted learning near peer assisted learning health professional students

References

  1. Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R. The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. ISRN Nurs. 2013;2013:930901.
  2. Emaliana I. Teacher-centered or Student-centered Learning Approach to Promote Learning ? J Sos Hum. 2017;10:59–70.
  3. Guraya SY, Abdalla ME. Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Jun;15(3):177–84.
  4. Carey MC, Chick A, Kent B, Latour JM. An exploration of peer-assisted learning in undergraduate nursing students in paediatric clinical settings: An ethnographic study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:212–7.
  5. Keifenheim KE, Petzold ER, Junne F, Erschens RS, Speiser N, Herrmann-Werner A, et al. Peer-Assisted History-Taking Groups: A Subjective Assessment of their Impact Upon Medical Students’ Interview Skills. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(3):Doc35.
  6. Cole JD, Ruble MJ, Donnelly J, Groves B. Peer-assisted learning: Clinical skills training for pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(6):644–8.
  7. Sibiya MN, Ngxongo TSP, Beepat SY. The influence of peer mentoring on critical care nursing students’ learning outcomes. Int J Work Heal Manag. 2018;11(3):130–42.
  8. Kamble PH, Khare AS, Maske SS, Sharma G, Kowale AN. Peer-assisted teaching method to foster learning physiological basis of electrocardiography among 1(st) year medical graduate students: An interventional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:64.
  9. Parmar S, Siddiqui A, Kaur S, Sarin J. Peer learning versus conventional teaching regarding antenatal assessment among nursing students in terms of knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: An interventional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:49.
  10. Baqal OJ, Soheib M, Saadallah AA. Peer-Led Surgical Safety Learning Among Medical Students Using a Novel Story-Based Approach. Cureus. 2020 Sep;12(9):e10242.
  11. Brunelli L, Tullio A, Perri G, Lesa L, Grillone L, Menegazzi G, et al. Peer education for medical students on health promotion and clinical risk management. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9(1).
  12. Aljahany M, Malaekah H, Alzahrani H, Alhamadah F, Dator WL. Simulation-based peer-assisted learning: Perceptions of health science students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:731–7.
  13. Gisbert DD, Rivas AV. Implementing Peer Tutoring for the Development of Empathy in Nursing Education. Investig y Educ en Enferm. 2021 Jun;39(2).
  14. DelNero T, Vyas D. Peer Teaching in an Interprofessional Education Activity Focused on Professional Skills Development. Pharm (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Jun;9(2).
  15. Choi JA, Kim O, Park S, Lim H, Kim JH. The Effectiveness of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021;50:92–101.
  16. Hall J, Freeman S, Parmar H, Pluen A. Team based learning: Preparing pharmacy students for an integrated curriculum during induction. Pharm Educ [Internet]. 2014;14(1):81–5. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904331001&partnerID=40&md5=a240c2575a26e514c7dce011d43b357c
  17. Ravanipour M, Bahreini M, Ravanipour M. Exploring nursing students’ experience of peer learning in clinical practice. J Educ Health Promot. 2015;4:46.
  18. Markowski M, Bower H, Essex R, Yearley C. Peer learning and collaborative placement models in health care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11–12):1519–41.
  19. Cheraghi F, Hooshangian M, Doosti-Irani A, Khalili A. The effect of peer support approach on communication skills of nursing students in pediatric clinical setting. Nurse Educ Pract [Internet]. 2021;52:102984. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595321000202
  20. Nelwati, Abdullah KL, Chong MC, McKenna L. The effect of peer learning on professional competence development among Indonesian undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. J Prof Nurs [Internet]. 2020;36(6):477–83. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722320300740
  21. Pålsson Y, Mårtensson G, Swenne CL, Ädel E, Engström M. A peer learning intervention for nursing students in clinical practice education: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2017;51:81–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691717300217
  22. Irvine S, Williams B, Özmen M, McKenna L. Exploration of self-regulatory behaviours of undergraduate nursing students learning to teach: A social cognitive perspective. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Nov;41:102633.
  23. Loda T, Erschens R, Nikendei C, Zipfel S, Herrmann-Werner A. Qualitative analysis of cognitive and social congruence in peer-assisted learning–The perspectives of medical students, student tutors and lecturers. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1).
  24. McPake M. Radiographers’ and students’ experiences of undergraduate radiotherapy practice placement in the United Kingdom. Radiography [Internet]. 2019;25(3):220–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.008

How to Cite

Sriwigati, D., & Musharyanti, L. (2022). Benefits and challenges of peer learning methods in health professional students: A literature review. Bali Medical Journal, 11(3), 1626–1631. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3755
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Dyah Sriwigati
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Lisa Musharyanti
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal