Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Comparison between mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and standard PCNL in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Kindy Aulia ,
  • Widi Atmoko ,
  • Ponco Birowo ,
  • Nur Rasyid ,


Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared to standard PCNL in children with nephrolithiasis. Clinical trials and observational studies comparing standard PCNL and mini-PCNL in pediatric patients were identified from electronic databases in November 2021.

Method: Studies were extracted for author, year, location, design, subjects’ age, sample size, objective, primary endpoint, level of evidence, and results (stone-free rates and complications). Results were subjected to qualitative analysis using the synthesis method. Adequate results were extracted and analyzed quantitatively using the fixed-effect model on homogenous data or the random-effect model on heterogeneous data for meta-analysis. Outcome variables are shown as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed with Review Manager version 5.4.

Result: We reported that stone-free rate and residual stone vary between two studies with contrary results. However, our quantitative analysis showed an insignificant difference between both groups of stone-free rate (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.22-2.54) and residual stone (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.55-2.91). Complications rates were insignificantly different between mini-PCNL group and PCNL group in two studies in Clavien 1 (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.27-1.54) and Clavien 2 grade (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.19-1.22). In addition, pooled analysis of both complication grades was also insignificant in the difference between groups (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.30-1.06).

Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of mini PCNL were neither superior nor inferior compared to standard PCNL in managing nephrolithiasis in pediatric patients. Moreover, mini PCNL was considered better regarding post-operative pain and tract infection; thus, mini PCNL could be considered a treatment option for pediatric patients with nephrolithiasis.


  1. Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep; 58(5): 299–306.
  2. Ozden E, Mercimek MM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric age group:
  3. Assessment of effectiveness and complications. World J Nephrol. 2016 Jan; 5(1): 84–9.
  4. Copelovitch L. Urolithiasis in children: Medical approach. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012 Aug; 59(4): 881–96.
  5. Jackson EC, Avendt-Reeber M. Urolithiasis in children: Treatment and prevention. Pediatric Urology. 2016 Feb; 2: 10–22.
  6. Sultan S, Umer SS, Ahmed B, Naqvi SA, Rizvi SA. Update on surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Front Pediatr. 2019 Jul; 7: 252.
  7. DeMarco RT. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. Adv Urol. 2011 Oct; 2011: 123606.
  8. Pelit ES, Kati B, Canakci C, Sagir S, Ciftci H. Outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infant: Single centre experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Oct; 43(5): 932–8.
  9. Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, Desai M, Montanari E, Kums J, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: Data from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. BJU Int. 2013 Jan; 111(1): 148–56.
  10. Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G, et al. Miniperc? No, Thank You! Eur Urol.
  11. ;51(3):810-815. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047
  12. Wu C, Hua L-X, Zhang J-Z, Zhou X-R, Zhong W, Ni H-D. Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and post-operative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33(1):36-43. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2016.10.012
  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7): e1000097.
  14. Critical appraisal tools for randomized-controlled trials [Internet]. The University of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available from:
  15. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct; 343.
  16. Lorenc T, Felix L, Petticrew M, Melendez-Torres J, Thomas J, Thomas S, et al. Meta-analysis, complexity, and heterogeneity: A qualitative interview study of researchers; methodological values and practices. Systematic Revies. 2016; 5(192).
  17. Howard JP, Arnold A, Ahmad Y. Bias, heterogeneity, and urcentainity in meta-anlaysis. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul; 41(28): 2712.
  18. Celik H, Camtosun A, Dede O, Dagguli M, Altintas R, Tasdemir C. Comparison of the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy with different sized instruments. Urolithiasis. 2017 Apr; 45(2): 203–8.
  19. Mahmood SN, Aziz BO, Tawfeeq HM, Fakhralddin SS. Mini versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough?. Ped Urol. 2019 Dec; 15(6): 664.
  20. Hasegan A, Pirvut V, Mihai I, Grigore N. The mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients. Roman J Urol.2017; 16(1): 5–8.
  21. Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J of Edu and Behav Stat. 2010 Apr; 35(2): 215–47.
  22. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, et al. OCEBM table of evidence working group [Internet]. Available from:
  23. Wang F, An HQ, Li J, Tian CY, Wang YJ. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children less than three years of age: Five-year experience in 234 cases. Urol Int. 2014; 92: 433–439.
  24. Abdelhafez MF, Amend B, Bedke J, Kruck S, Nagele U, Stenzl A, Schilling D. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comparative study of the management of small and large renal stones. Urology. 2013; 81: 241–245.
  25. Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoglu YK, Ozkaya O, Sarikaya S. Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol. 2011; 185: 264–268.
  26. Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhao Z, Yuan J, Wu W, Zhong W. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants: Evaluation of a single-center experience. Urology. 2012; 80: 408–411.
  27. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: Results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology. 2012; 80: 519–523.
  28. Yan X, Al-Hayek S, Gan W, Zhu W, Li X, Guo H. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in preschool age children with kidney calculi (including stones induced by melamine-contaminated milk powder). Pediatr Surg Int. 2012; 28: 1021–1024.
  29. Aydogdu O, Karakose A, Celik O, Atesci YZ. Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World J Clin Pediatr. 2014 Feb; 3(1): 1–5.
  30. Kosar A, Sarica K, Aydos K, Kupeli S, Turkolmez K, Gogus O. Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone surgery for kidney stones. Int J Urol. 1999 Mar; 6(2): 125–9.
  31. Elderwy AA, Gadelmoula M, Elgammal MA, Osama E, Al-Hazmi H, Hammouda H, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report. Urol Ann. 2014; 6: 187–191.
  32. Desoky EA, El-Sayed ER, Eliwa A, Sleem M, Shabana W, Dawood T, et al. Flank-free Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Pediatric Age Group. Urology. 2015;85:1162–1165.
  33. Tang C, Chung H, Huang E, Lin T. Standardized analysis of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy complications with Clavien classification. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2014 Oct; 77(12): 23–6.
  34. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Patel SH, Bapat SD. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. J Endourol. 2004; 18: 23–27.
  35. Haraldstad K, Christophersen K, Helseth S. Health-related quality of life and pain in children and adolescents: A school survey. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17: 174.
  36. Dorosiev E, Minova G, Pelov T, Mladenov B. Initial experience in the field of pediatric percutaneous nephrolitholapaxia in Bulgaria. Folia Medica. 2021; 63(3): 348–54.
  37. Hosseini M, Irani D, Altofeyli A, Eslahi A, Basiratnia M, Haghpanah A, et al. Outcome of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients under the age of 18: an experience with 112 cases. Front Surg. 2021; 8: 613812.

How to Cite

Aulia, K., Atmoko, W., Birowo, P., & Rasyid, N. (2022). Comparison between mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and standard PCNL in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bali Medical Journal, 11(3), 1331–1338.