Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer


Background: The personality factor can detect a person's counterproductive behavior. Certain personality types determine a person's work style and the limitations and weaknesses of his performance. One tool used to detect personality types related to work style is the DISC personality model. This study aims to determine the behavioral type of nurses based on the DISC application.

Methods: This research used mixed methods. Research design begins with data collection and analysis using quantitative procedures, then continues with data collection and analysis. Quantitative approaches through descriptive analysis implemented a behavioral scale counterproductive and DISC personality profile using the DISC application. The DISC app helps organizations describe personality information, make decisions, and interact with team members and other stakeholders.

Results: Characteristics of respondents at Klaten Hospital consisted of 58.8% of respondents aged 20-40 and 41.2% of respondents aged 41.2%. From several respondents, it can be seen that the respondents' behavior is dominant and conscientiousness, with the overall scores, obtained being 38% and 35%. While the scores for the characteristics of influence and stability are 17% and 10%, respectively.  

Conclusions: Most nurses had dominant and conscientious personalities. The results came from four behavioral dimensions (dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness).


  1. Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 Tentang Tenaga Kesehatan. Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. 2014.
  2. Lu F, Xu Y, Yu Y, Li P, Wu T, Wang T, et al. Moderating Effect of Mindfulness on the Relationships Between Perceived Stress and Mental Health Outcomes Among Chinese Intensive Care Nurses. 2019.
  3. Summit I of M (US) C on the HPE, Greiner AC, Knebel E. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Health Professions Education. National Academies Press (US); 2003.
  4. AL-Dossary RN. Leadership in Nursing. Contemporary Leadership Challenges. IntechOpen; 2017.
  5. Medland J, Stern M. Coaching as a successful strategy for advancing new manager competency and performance. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2009;25(3):141–7.
  6. Hojat M, Erdmann J, Gonnella J. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach. 2013;35(7).
  7. Institute of Medicine. Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2004.
  8. Kuvaas B. Different relationships between perceptions of developmental performance appraisal and work performance. Pers Rev. 2007;36(3):378–97.
  9. Anjum MA, Parvez A. Counterproductive behavior at work: A comparison of blue collar and white collar workers. Pakistan J Commer Soc Sci. 2013;7(3):417–34.
  10. Bashir S, Nasir M, Qayyum S, Bashir A. Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Public Sector Organizations of Pakistan. Public Organ Rev. 2012;12(4):357–66.
  11. Spector P, Fox S, Domagalski T. Emotions, Violence and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Handbook of Workplace Violence. 2006.
  12. Keogh TJ, Robinson JC, Parnell JM. Assessing Behavioral Styles Among Nurse Managers: Implications for Leading Effective Teams. Hosp Top. 2019;97(1):32.
  13. Furlow L. Job profiling: building a winning team using behavioral assessments. J Nurs Adm. 2000;30(3):107–11.
  14. Fuqua RM, Bryan J. The Psychology of Leadership Selection: DiSC Results and Leadership Success in Health Care. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2017;4(10):97–102.
  15. Atkinson RL, Atkinson RC, Hilgard ER. Pengantar Psikologi Jilid 1 dan 2. Bandung: Penerbit Erlanga; 1987.
  16. Mardiansyah, Arga, Yanuary, Adrian. Modul Pelatihan DISC. Jakarta; 2014.
  17. Bell R, Fann S, Morrison J, Lisk J. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(6):534–41.
  18. Rohm RA. Positive Personality Profiles: D-I-S-C-Over Personality Insights to Understand Yourself and Others! Voyages Press, Incorporated; 1994. 197 p.
  19. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2017. 275 p.
  20. Consulting Moleong L. Metodology Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset; 2004.
  21. Wiley. Research Report for Adaptive Testing Assessment Overview of this Research Report. 2013.
  22. Diab-Bahman R. The Impact of Dominant Personality Traits on Team Roles. Open Psychol J. 2021;14(1):33–45.
  23. Scullard M, Baum D. Everything DiSC Manual | Wiley. 2015.
  24. Milne N, Louwen C, Reidlinger D, Bishop J, Dalton M, Crane L. Physiotherapy students’ DiSC behaviour styles can be used to predict the likelihood of success in clinical placements. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1).
  25. Anirudh Bhardwaj VIT Chennai C, Mishra VIT Chennai M, Hemalatha VIT Chennai S. An Automated Compatibility Prediction Engine using DISC Theory Based Classification and Neural Networks. Cornell Univ. 2017;4(8):1–9.
  26. Yanuari A. Personality Assessment For Psychology. Jakarta: One Spirit; 2015.
  27. HURLOCK EB. Psikologi perkembangan : suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. Jakarta: Erlangga; 1980.
  28. Kouzes JM, Posner BZ. The leadership challenge. Jossey-Bass; 2007. 389 p.
  29. Feather R, Ebright R, Bakas T. Nurse Manager Behaviors That RNs Perceive to Affect Their Job Satisfaction. Nurs Forum. 2015;50(2):125–36.
  30. Carnevale AP |Smith. NA. Nursing: Supply and Demand through 2020. Georg Univ Cent Educ Work. 2015;
  31. Martin WE, Keogh TJ. Managing medical groups: 21st century challenges and the impact of physician leadership styles. Vol. 20, The Journal of medical practice management : MPM. 2004. p. 102–6.
  32. KL M, GN S, CR G. Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: impact on process quality and patient safety. Health Care Manage Rev. 2015;40(1):24–34.
  33. Merrill K. Leadership style and patient safety: implications for nurse managers. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(6):319–24.
  34. Inscape Publishing I. DiSC ® Classic Validation Report [Internet]. 2008. Available from: Reports and White Papers/DiSCClassicValidationResearchReport.pdf
  35. McDaniel R, Lanham H, Anderson R. Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for the design of research on health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34(2):191–9.
  36. Jordon M, Lanham H, Anderson R, McDaniel R. Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for interpreting research about health care organizations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(1):228–31.

How to Cite

Aini, Q. (2021). Detecting nurse’s personality models with disc. Bali Medical Journal, 10(3), 1038–1041.




Search Panel