Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The association between nasal septum deviation angle and type with the severity of nasal obstruction based on NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation) score before surgery at Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar

  • Luh Putu Happy Sandha ,
  • Luh Made Ratnawati ,
  • I Ketut Suanda ,

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal obstruction is a nasal complaint that is not life-threatening but can affect the patient's quality of life while awake or sleeping. One of the anatomical factor that can affect this condition is nasal septum deviation including its angle and type. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between the angle and type of nasal septum deviation with the severity of nasal obstruction.

Method: This study was a retrospective observational analytic study with a cross-sectional design. The CT scan of the subject was analyzed to assess the angle of septum deviation and the Mladina’s 7 type classification of septum deviation. The severity of nasal obstruction assessed by the NOSE questionnaire.

Results: Of the 50 subjects, 27 (54%) men and 23 (46%) woman with an average age of 34.64±12.8 years. Type III deviated nasal septum was the most frequent (28%) followed by type I (14%). The mean deviated nasal septum angle was 20,307,07o. There was a statistically significant association between the deviated nasal septum angle with the higher NOSE score with a strong positive correlation value based on the Pearson correlation test (r=0.771; p < 0.000). There was no statistically significant association between the type of deviated nasal septum with the NOSE score.

Conclusion: There is a statistically significant association between the angle and type of deviated nasal septum with the severity of nasal obstruction based on bivariate analysis. The angle of deviated nasal septum was a statistically significant independent factor of higher NOSE score.  

References

  1. Ballenger JJ. Anatomy and Physiology of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses. In: Ballenger’s Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2003. p.547-60.
  2. Jin HR, Lee JY, Jung WJ. New Description Method and Classification System for Septum Deviation. Original article J Rhinol. 2007; 14 (1): 27-31.
  3. Aziz T, Vincent LB, Ansari K, Flores CM. Measurement Tools for Diagnostic and Management of Nasal Septum Deviation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck. 2011; 43 (11): 2-9.
  4. 9Mladina R, Cujic E, Subaric M, Et Al. Nasal Septum Deformities in Ear Nose and Throat Patients. An International Study. Am J Otol. 2008; 29(2): 75–82.
  5. 4Camacho M, Zaghi S, Certal V, Abdullatif J, Modi R, Sridhara S, Tolisano A, Chang ET, Cable BB, Capasso R. Predictors of Nasal Obstruction: Quantification and Assessment Using Multiple Grading Scales. Plastic Surgery International. 2016; 1-9.
  6. 6Stewart, Michael, B. J. Ferguson, and Len Fromer. 2010. “Epidemiology and Burden of Nasal Congestion.” International Journal of General Medicine 3: 37–45.
  7. 12Janovic, Natasa, Aleksa Janovic, Biljana Milicic, and Marija Djuric. 2020. “Association between Nasal Septum Morphology and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Severity: Computed Tomography Study.” Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (xx).
  8. 5Naclerio, Robert M., Claus Bachert, and James N. Baraniuk. 2010. “Pathophysiology of Nasal Congestion.” International Journal of General Medicine 3: 47–57.
  9. 7Verhoeven, Sarah, and Bert Schmelzer. 2016. “Type and Severity of Septal Deviation Are Not Related with the Degree of Subjective Nasal Obstruction *.” 2013(4): 355–60.
  10. 8Budiman, Bestari J, and Ade Asyari. 2012. “Tinjauan Pustaka Pengukuran Sumbatan Hidung Pada Deviasi Septum Nasi.” 1(1): 16–21.
  11. 10Rao, J. Janardhan et al. 2005. “Classification of Nasal Septal Deviations - Relation to Sinonasal Pathology.” Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 57(3): 199–201.
  12. 11Wee, Jee Hye et al. 2012. “Classification and Prevalence of Nasal Septum Deformity in Koreans According to Two Classification Systems.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 132(SUPPL. 1): 52–57.
  13. 13Serifoglu, Ismail et al. 2017. “Association between the Degree and Direction of Nasal Septum Deviation and Nasal Bone Morphology.” Head & face medicine 13(1): 3.
  14. 14Liu, Ting et al. 2012. “Effects of Septum Deviation on the Airflow Characteristics: Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Models.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 132(3): 290–98.
  15. 15Simmen, Daniel, José L. Scherrer, Kris Moe, and Benjamin Heinz. 1999. “A Dynamic and Direct Visualization Model for the Study of Nasal Airflow.” Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 125(9): 1015–21.
  16. 16Gerecci, Deniz et al. 2018. “Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Score Outcomes After Septorhinoplasty.” : 1–6.

How to Cite

Sandha, L. P. H., Ratnawati, L. M., & Suanda, I. K. (2021). The association between nasal septum deviation angle and type with the severity of nasal obstruction based on NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation) score before surgery at Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar. Bali Medical Journal, 10(3), 1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2614

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Luh Putu Happy Sandha
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Luh Made Ratnawati
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


I Ketut Suanda
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal