Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Evaluation of chronic disease management programs in developed and underdeveloped regions in Indonesia

  • Ahmad Muhammad Kasim ,
  • Yodi Mahendradhata ,
  • Laksono Trisnantoro ,


Abstract

Introduction: Chronic diseases have become a major cause of death in the world, and a major source of morbidity and misery. Approximately 80% of related deaths occur in developing countries. Chronic Disease Management Program (CDMP) is an integrative program aimed to control the prevalence of chronic diseases. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the interaction between context and process in CDMP services, and to determine how CDMP was implemented in developed and underdeveloped regions.

Methods: This qualitative study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Subjects were selected by purposive sampling from CDMP organizers in Primary Health Centers for a commitment-based capitation assessment. Transcript data were analyzed thematically by summarizing and identifying major themes based on the CFIR domains.

Results: The main activities of the CDMP (medical consultations, monitoring of health status, health educational, reminders, home visit and group activities/gymnastics) in developed regions were conducted according to the technical manual. However, in underdeveloped regions, some modifications were needed, i.e. the medical consultations, medical checkups and health education undertaken by a nurse in charge and not always conducted by a doctor; and, the services were conducted at the village meeting halls. Also, the reminders were delivered through socialization by local governments and direct invitation by team members when they met the participants on the roadway or in the neighborhood around the participants’ homes.

Conclusion: CDMP cannot fully be implemented in underdeveloped regions and some modifications were needed according to local conditions.

Keywords: Chronic Disease Management Program developed regions underdeveloped regions Consolidated Framework for Implementation Researc

References

  1. Manjomo RC, Mwagomba B, Ade S, Ali E, Ben-Smith A, Khomani P, et al. Managing and monitoring chronic non-communicable diseases in a primary health care clinic, Lilongwe, Malawi. Public Heal action [Internet]. 2016;6(2):60–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358797
  2. Byrnes A, Haregu TN, Pasricha N, Singh K, Thirunavukkarasu S, Wickkramasinghe K, et al. Strengthening Noncommunicable Disease Research Capacity and Chronic Disease Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in South Asia: Implementation and Evaluation of the ASCEND Program. Asia Pacific J Public Heal. 2019;101053951986779.
  3. Hamar GB, Rula EY, Coberley C, Pope JE, Larkin S. Long-term impact of a chronic disease management program on hospital utilization and cost in an Australian population with heart disease or diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2015;15:174. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84928790831&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
  4. Lix L, Ayles J, Bartholomew S, Cooke C, Ellison J, Emond V, et al. The Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System: A model for collaborative surveillance. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2018;3(3).
  5. Wang S, Kou C, Liu Y, Li B, Tao Y, D’Arcy C, et al. Rural-urban differences in the prevalence of chronic disease in northeast China. Asia-Pacific J Public Heal. 2015;27(4):394–406.
  6. Mohammadifard N, Tavasoli AA, Khosravi A, Bahonar A. Short-Term Results of a Community-Based Program on Promoting Healthy Lifestyle for Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases in a Developing Country Setting : Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. 2011;
  7. Kirsch F. Economic Evaluations of Multicomponent Disease Management Programs with Markov Models: A Systematic Review. Value Heal [Internet]. 2016;19(8):1039–54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.07.004
  8. Ulfayani Ramsar, Laksono Trisnantoro LPP. Implementasi program pengelolaan penyakit kronis (Prolanis) di Primary Health Centers Poasia Kota Kendari. J Kebijak Kesehat Indones. 2017;06:200–3.
  9. Fachmi Idris. Panduan praktis Prolanis (Program pengelolaan penyakit kronis). BPJS Kesehat. 2014;
  10. Rijken M, Bekkema N, Boeckxstaens P, Schellevis FG, De Maeseneer JM, Groenewegen PP. Chronic Disease Management Programmes: An adequate response to patients’ needs? Heal Expect. 2014;17(5):608–21.
  11. Presiden RI. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 131 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penetapan Daerah Tertinggal Tahun 2015-2019. 2015.
  12. McAlearney AS, Walker DM, Livaudais-Toman J, Parides M, Bickell NA. Challenges of implementation and implementation research: Learning from an intervention study designed to improve tumor registry reporting. SAGE Open Med [Internet]. 2016;4:205031211666621. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312116666215
  13. Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O. Implementation research : what it is and how to do it. 2013;6753(November):1–7.
  14. Creswell JW. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches.pdf. 2014.
  15. Varsi C, Ekstedt M, Gammon D, Ruland CM. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of an internet-based patient-provider communication service in five settings: A qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11).
  16. Fredriksson M, Eldh AC, Vengberg S, Dahlström T, Halford C, Wallin L, et al. Local politico-administrative perspectives on quality improvement based on national registry data in Sweden: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2014;9(1):189. Available from: http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-014-0189-6
  17. Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glisson CA, Kohl PL, Raghavan R, Brownson RC, et al. A mixed methods multiple case study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations: Study protocol. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1).
  18. Laksono AD, Wulandari RD, Soedirham O. Urban and rural disparities in hospital utilization among Indonesian adults. Iran J Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;48(2):247–55.
  19. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2014 tentang Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2014. p. 1–24.
  20. BPJS Kesehatan. Gate Keeper Concept. 2012;2938:1–27.
  21. Laihad F, Sari JFK, Woelandaroe RD, Khanal S, Setiawan B, Ang A, et al. Buku Panduan Perencanaan Tingkat Primary Health Centers Terpadu. 2015;1–68. Available from: https://batukarinfo.com/system/files/Buku Panduan Perencanaan Tingkat Primary Health Centers Terpadu.pdf
  22. Lee JA, Choi M, Lee SA, Jiang N. Effective behavioral intervention strategies using mobile health applications for chronic disease management: A systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1).

How to Cite

Kasim, A. M., Mahendradhata, Y., & Trisnantoro, L. (2021). Evaluation of chronic disease management programs in developed and underdeveloped regions in Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal, 10(1), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i1.2099
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
1

Total
13

Share

Search Panel

Ahmad Muhammad Kasim
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Yodi Mahendradhata
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Laksono Trisnantoro
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal