Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Unilateral pedicle screw fixation as a less invasive surgical procedure: a case series and literature review

Abstract

Introduction: The principle of treatment for degenerative spinal diseases when conservative modality failed is surgery. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a less invasive methods with clinical outcomes that were similar to a bilateral fixation, especially for lumbar degenerative disease. Improvement of symptoms, neurological outcome and spinal stability is the utmost priority. This was a case series study with five patients with degenerative spine disease from January 2019 - January 2020. The aims are to evaluate unilateral pedicle screw surgery outcomes and elucidate the effectiveness of this method clinically.

Case Description: Five patients aged 40-64 years old involved in this series. Four patients presented with lumbar radiculopathy and one patient with cervical radiculopathy. All experienced weakness (MMT score 2-4) and pain along the affected extremities. Three patients diagnosed with concomitant Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) and Foraminal Stenosis (FS) based on clinical examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging result. The rest of two patients each diagnosed with FS and HNP. Surgery initiated with a midline incision. Muscle ipsilateral to the symptomatic side was dissected and retracted to expose the facet joint and the vertebral lamina. Screws were inserted into the vertebral body and the rod used to connect the screws was bent following the vertebral curvature. Facetectomy or Hemilaminectomy was done to expose and decompress the ipsilateral side's nerve root and intervertebral space. The incision site is then irrigated and closed. All operation was done by the same surgeon. Postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated for six months after surgery. All patients showed a complete motor improvement and fully relieved from pain.

Conclusion: Unilateral pedicle screw fixation is considered as a less invasive instrumentation system with clinical outcome comparable to bilateral screw fixation.

References

  1. Lu P, Pan T, Dai T, Chen G, Shi KQ. Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x.
  2. Mao L, Chen GD, Xu XM, et al. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed with Unilateral or Bilateral Pedicle Screw. Orthopedics. 2013;36:1
  3. Eliades P, Rahal JP, Herrick DB, et al. Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation is Associated with Reduced Cost and Similar Outcomes in Selected Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for L4 – 5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Cureus. 2015; 7(2): e249
  4. Awad BI, Lubelski D, Shin JH, Carmody MA, Hoh DJ, Mroz TE, Steinmetz MP. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation versus Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Facet Screws for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Global Spine J. 2013 Dec;3(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349399.
  5. Shen X, Wang L, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, He S. e Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(1):1–8.
  6. Kasai Y, Inaba T, Kato T, Matsumura Y, Akeda K, Uchida A. Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(3):364–7.
  7. Kim T, Lee BH, Moon S, Lee S, Lee H. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after successful posterolateral fusion with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine J.2013;13(10):1208–16.
  8. Du JY, Kiely PD, Al Maaieh M, Aichmair A, Huang RC. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of adjacent segment disease: a preliminary report. J Spine Surg. 2017 Sep;3(3):330-337. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.06.17.
  9. Godzik J, Campo EM, Newcomb AG, et al. Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral vs. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurgery. 2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018;02.053
  10. Goel VK, Lim HT, Gwon J, et al. Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; S155–61.
  11. Ambati D V, Wright EK, Lehman RA, Kang DG, Wagner SC, Dmitriev AE. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. Spine J. 2014.
  12. Liu H, Xu Y, Yang S, Wang T, Wang H, Liu F, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. Medicine. 2017; 96:21
  13. Wang L, Wang Y, Li Z, Yu B, Li Y. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC surgery. 2014;1–7.
  14. Shen X, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, Zhou X, He S. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;8–12.
  15. Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH. Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Spine. 2000;25(14):1843–7.
  16. Hu X-Q, Wu X-L, Xu C, Zheng X-H, Jin Y-L, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e87501
  17. Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F, et al. Examining Risk Factors for Posterior Migration of Fusion Cages Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Possible Limitation of Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:381 – 387.

How to Cite

Mahadewa, T. G. B. (2020). Unilateral pedicle screw fixation as a less invasive surgical procedure: a case series and literature review. Bali Medical Journal, 9(3), 705–709. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i3.2042

HTML
1

Total
16

Share

Search Panel

Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal