Evaluation of bacterial infection of split-thickness skin grafts at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
- PDF  |
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i1.1760  |
- Published: 2020-04-01
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Search for the other articles from the author in:
Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal
Background: Split skin grafts are frequently employed to provide biological cover for extensive wounds. The clinical outcome of skin grafts depends on a variety of factors of which infection is one of the most important. The intent of this study was to define the micro-organisms causing skin graft infections and failures at the National Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Centre (NRPSBC) at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH).Â
Aim: The study assessed the extent to which bacterial infection of grafted wounds resulted in graft failure and subsequent re- grafting.
Materials and Methods: The study was a longitudinal study conducted on the wards of the NRPSBC at the KBTH on patients with wounds who received split skin grafts. Wound swabs of discharging grafted wounds were inoculated into a Stuarts’ transport medium to prevent desiccation and transported immediately to the microbiology laboratory for further processing.
Results: Fifteen (20.8%) of the grafts failed to take. The incidence of infected grafted wounds was 79.2% (57). Infected grafted wounds that resulted in graft failure were 14 out of 57 infected wounds (24.6%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Pseudomonas Species were identified as the bacteria frequently involved in graft failure at the NRPSBC.
Conclusion: In this study, we found a graft failure rate of 20.8%. This was influenced by the bacterial load present in the graft bed.
Â