Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Validity S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring to predict stone free status in kidney stone patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • Anak Agung Gde Oka ,
  • Anak Agung Ayu Oka Kusuma Dewi ,
  • I Gede Raka Widiana ,


Abstract

Background: Kidney stone still a health problem in the world. Today, the choice of therapeutic modality is also increasingly varied, percutaneous nephrolitotomy (PCNL) is still the first line for stone therapy with varying success rates, some high or low. Sometimes need additional measures such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the rest stone and good preventive behaviour are needed. This can be influenced by several risk factors, a risk factor predictor is required to get a high stone free rate in patients after PCNL.

Methods: This research is a cross sectional retrospective study, we recorded 50 patients at the Medical Records Installation at Sanglah Education General Hospital in Denpasar since January 2018-November 2019 with kidney stones performed by PCNL, each patient will be calculated S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score can be seen on CT Stonography and the presence or absence of stone after PCNL. The parameters of S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry are size, tract obstruction, number of calyces, essence. And calculated the best cut off, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score to predict stone free status after PCNL.

Results: The best cut off value in this study is <9, where patients with S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score  < 9 have a risk stone free after PCNL 25 (50%) patients, while the S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score >9, has a risk of not being free and there are stones left  25 (50%) patients. S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry had % sensitivity 60.6%, specificity 70.6%, and 64 % accuracy in this study. Positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 80% and 48%.

Conclusion: from this study the S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score sensitively predicts stone free status in kidney stone patients after PCNL and can be used as a tool to education the patient before PCNL and therapy.

Keywords: S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry score PCNL stone free status.

References

  1. Akhavein A, Henriksen C, Syed J, Bird VG. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome. Urology. 2015;85(1):69-73.
  2. Choi SW, Bae WJ, Ha U, Hong S, Lee JY. Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone scoring systems and preoperative parameters. World J Urol. 2016;35(3):449-457.
  3. Dewi RDAP, Ngurah SAA. Profil Analisis Batu Saluran Kencing di Instalasi Laboratorium Klinik RSUP Sanglah Denpasar. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2007;8(3):205-209.
  4. Huynh LM, Huang E, Patel RM, Okhunov Z. Predictability and practically of image-based scoring systems for patient assessment and outcome stratification during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a contemporary update. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(12):95.
  5. Khalique A, Arshad S, Kumar P, Hussain M. Frequency of stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in adult patients with renal insufficiency. African Journal of Urology. 2017;23:219-233.
  6. Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Tiselius H. Kidney Stone. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;25(2):22.
  7. Kumar S, Keshavamurthy R, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A. Complication after Experience over 7 Years. IBJU. 2017;43(4):704-712.
  8. Litwin MS, Bergman J. Campbell Walsh Urology 10th Edition: Outcome Research. 11th Edition. Philadelphia : Saunders; 2016.
  9. Okhunov Z, Fridiander JI, George AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology. 2013;81(6):1154-9.
  10. Pearle MS, Lotan Y. Campbell Walsh Urology 10th Edition: Urinary Lithiasis. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2016.
  11. Pradeepkumar K, Raja R, Chengalvarayan G, Ilamparuthi C. Evaluation of S.T.O.N.E Scoring in predicting outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. IJCAR. 2017;24(5):1836-1840.
  12. Putri KT, Djojodimejo T, Rizaldi F, Hardjowijoto S. Correlation Between STONE nephrolithometry Scoring in Predicting Free-stone Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Indonesian Journal of Urology. 2016;24(1):12-19.
  13. Ramesh O, Chary KS, Gopichand M, Gottumukkala RP. Complication of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Private Practice. J Evaluation Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(22):1175-11179.
  14. Sakhaee K. Urinary pH as a risk factor for stone type. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 2007;74:74-81.
  15. Taguchi K, Cho SY. Guideline: The Urological Association of Asia Clinical Guideline for Urinary Stone Disease. International Journal of Urology. 2019;26:688-709.
  16. Talati J, Tiselius HG, Albala DM, and Ye Z. Urolithiasis: basic science and clinical practice. USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
  17. Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology; 2017. p. 5-83.
  18. Wagner CA, Mohebbi N. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol. 2010;23(6):S165-9.
  19. Wida AA, Duarsa GW, Oka AAG, Yudiana W, Santosa KB, Mahadewa TGB. Durasi operasi dan lama perawatan percutaneus nefrolitotomi posisi supine lebih singkat dibandingkan posisi prone pada pasien batu ginjal di Denpasar. Medicina. 2019;50:797-803.
  20. Wolf SJ. Campbell Walsh Urology 10th Edition: Percutaneous Approaches to the Upper Urinary Tract Collecting System. Amerika Serikat: Saunders Elsevier; 2016.
  21. Yarimoglu S, Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O. External validation and Comparison of the Scoring System for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcome: single center experience with 506 Cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(12):1284-1289.
  22. Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Guideline of Guidelines: Kidney Stone. BJU Int. 2015;116:184-189.

How to Cite

Oka, A. A. G., Dewi, A. A. A. O. K., & Widiana, I. G. R. (2020). Validity S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring to predict stone free status in kidney stone patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Bali Medical Journal, 9(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i1.1719
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Anak Agung Gde Oka
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

Anak Agung Ayu Oka Kusuma Dewi
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal

I Gede Raka Widiana
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal