Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Penile necrosis due to calciphylaxis in peritoneal dyalisis patient: a case report

  • Dahril Dahril ,
  • Fitro Manurun ,
  • Rovy Pratama ,

Abstract

Introduction: Calciphylaxis (or calcific uremic arteriolopathy) is a life-threatening condition that affects 1–4% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Penile necrosis is one of the complications of calciphylaxis that occur in ESRD patients undergone haemodialysis. Although rarely happen, this condition is potentially life-threatening and usually has a poor prognosis. It is associated with diabetes mellitus (DM), cholesterol embolism. The treatment varies, from surgical to conservative, and is usually depends on patient’s general condition.

Case presentation: A 41-years-old male, known to have ESRD and underwent hemodialysis for 1 year in 2014, but has been switched to peritoneal dialysis ever since, presented with complaints of severe pain, purulent and progressive necrosis of glans penis within the last two months, and history of long-term DM and hypertension. Physical examination showed that the patient was alert, with blood pressure of 141/80 mmHg, pulse rate of 88 bpm, respiration rate of 20 times per minute, and temperature of 36.8ºC. A yellow purulent tissue was noticed over the glans penis, foul-smelling discharge was observed from urethra and undersurface of penile lesion. Laboratory examination showed elevated calcium level of 7.3 mg/dL. Ultrasound revealed multiple calcifications at the base of penis, hypoechoic lesion, nearly circular, irregular border, likely sac with thin wall, attached to the gland penis, and filled with exudate. Doppler confirmation showed avascular area. The patient was treated with partial penectomy, debridement, and antibiotic.

Conclusion: Calciphylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients as reported in this case was rarely found. Although the treatment is still debatable, however, we decided to impose surgical approach in this patient along with antibiotics. Despite its poor prognosis, the patient in this case showed improvement after the procedure.

References

  1. Matur AV, Azad S, Singh M, Anand N. Penile necrosis in association with chronic renal failure; Calciphylaxis or Calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Journal of Diabetology. 2013;4(2):1-3.
  2. Sandhu G, Casares P, Ranade A, Jones J, Amar LI, Guisado D, et al. 2013. Acute calciphylaxis precipitated by the initiation of hemodialysis. Clinical nephrology.80(4):301-5.
  3. Mazhar AR, Johnson RJ, Gillen D, Stivelman JC, Ryan MJ, Davis CL, et al. Risk factors and mortality associated with calciphylaxis in end-stage renal disease. Kidney International. 2001;60(1):324-32.
  4. Sarkis E. Penile and generalised calciphylaxis in peritoneal dialysis. BMJ case reports. 2015;2:15-19.
  5. Prematilleke I, Espinosa O, Henderson J, Altmann P, Roberts I. Penile calciphylaxis: an unusual cause of penile necrosis. Histopathology. 2012;61(4):749-50.
  6. Bappa A, Hakim F, Ahmad M, Assirri A. Penile gangrene due to calcific uremic arteriopathy. Annals of African medicine. 2011;10(2):181-4.
  7. Haider I, Siddiqui M, Naji W, Sheikh M, Waqar A. Calciphylaxis leading to penile necrosis. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2014;64(6):711-3.
  8. Barthelmes L, Chezhian C, Thomas KJ. Progression to wet gangrene in penile necrosis and calciphylaxis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34(2):231-5.
  9. Guvel S, Yaycioglu O, Kilinc F, Torun D, Kayaselcuk F, Ozkardes H. Penile necrosis in end-stage renal disease. Journal of Andrology. 2004;25(1):25-9.
  10. Rizvi T, Al-Nakshabandi NA. Penile necrosis due to calciphylaxis in a patient of end-stage renal disease. Saudi Medical Journal. 2009;30(1):143-5.
  11. Karpman E, Das S, Kurzrock EA. Penile calciphylaxis: analysis of risk factors and mortality. The Journal Of Urology. 2003;169(6):2206-9.

How to Cite

Dahril, D., Manurun, F., & Pratama, R. (2020). Penile necrosis due to calciphylaxis in peritoneal dyalisis patient: a case report. Bali Medical Journal, 9(1), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i1.1712

HTML
1

Total
24

Share

Search Panel